Law Office of David Miklas, P.A.

Labor & Employment law - Employers only

Can you look to hire a younger guy with fresh ideas?

Recently an employer in Stuart, FL received a complaint from a 59-year-old employee alleging age discrimination in the workplace.  The Stuart, Florida employee claimed that he was discouraged from submitting an application for a vacant position by one of the employer’s top officials, who was 64 years old, stating he desired a “younger guy with fresh ideas.”

The lawyer’s investigation noted that nearly every employee interviewed characterized the manager as a “bully” and as having an aggressive, confrontational manner. Because of these characteristics, the manager’s communications with employees tends to be “intimidating.”

As a result of this compliant and the investigations, the manager stepped down from his role.  This was the result even though the investigation concluded the manager had no intent to discriminate against the applicant based on age.

The above facts were taken from news reports and the two investigative reports concerning Tom Campenni, the former City of Stuart mayor.

Treasure Coast businesses should recall that one of the six priorities in the EEOC’s Strategic Enforcement Plan for the next five years is to eliminate barriers in recruitment and hiring.

If you need any assistance in handling age discrimination matters or issues dealing with hiring older workers concerning your Florida business, please promptly email the Law Office of David Miklas, P.A. or call us at

You can read more of our employment law articles on our legal updates page.

If you know a Florida business owner or Florida human resources professional who would benefit from this article, please share it with one click to social media or email.

The employee made a complaint about age discrimination to the employer’s Human Resources Director, who commenced an age-discrimination investigation into the discriminatory remark about the staffer’s age.  During the human resources investigation, the employer’s top official who was accused of making the discriminatory remark, denied that it was discrimination, but admitted to making a comment that he prefers a candidate who is not close to retirement.

The employer then brought in an outside third party (experienced employment discrimination attorney) to conduct an impartial investigation into the allegations of age discrimination.  The lawyer’s investigation determined that the employer manager had similar conversations with four other employees advising them that he wanted a certain individual to fill the vacant position, and he strongly discouraged some of them from applying for the position. In discouraging employees from applying for the, the manager made comments such as the following:

  • I want someone with new fresh ideas.
  • We need a younger person.
  • We need a younger [person], someone on their way up who will build their experience here, not end it.

The lawyer’s investigation concluded that the manager had pre-selected his personal choice for the vacant position, and that he wanted someone who was a “younger” individual.